HPE Services Management

An enterprise services-management design study exploring how customers and internal teams discover services, configure quotes, and move between product and service platforms. The documented work focuses on experience strategy and journey design.

My role
UX / UI design
Audience
Customers, sales, partners & operations
Scope
Experience strategy, journeys & system flows

Original diagrams from the supplied study. Images are illustrative; published personas and journeys are reference-only due to NDA.

Why redesign?

Service configuration and quote creation span multiple roles and platforms. The study identifies deeply nested information, difficult service-to-product association, and limited quote tracking as sources of friction. These challenges informed the proposed experience, but the underlying research data is not reproduced in the source.

The design goal

Make service selection easier to navigate, preserve product context, and clarify the handoffs involved in configuring and tracking a quote.

Core strategy

From understanding the context to shaping the experience.

1

Align on the platform and its constraints

Client knowledge-transfer sessions with business and technology teams established a shared product vision and an understanding of the existing platform, opportunities, and requirements.

2

Map the people and responsibilities

I mapped customer, sales representative, partner, operations, and solution architect perspectives. The published personas are reference examples derived from role-play because of NDA restrictions, rather than evidence from real participants.

3

Connect roles to their journeys

The journey maps connect account access, quote requests, configuration, notifications, and status tracking. They show how a request moves between people, not only between screens; the published journeys are also reference-only due to NDA.

4

Define service-led and product-led paths

I documented separate system flows for customers starting with services and those arriving with a selected product. These flows make platform handoffs and the selection of bundles or individual services explicit.

A role-based quote journey

Annotated view

People + responsibilities

  1. 01Customer

    Discover services and request a quote for a product.

  2. 02Sales representative

    Guide the customer and connect them with quote support.

  3. 03Partner / solution architect

    Configure suitable services and resolve product association.

  4. 04Operations

    Monitor processing, exceptions, and reporting needs.

Illustrative responsibility map based on source pages 12–24. Reference roles and journeys are not validated research participants; the sequence summarizes handoff responsibilities, not approval authority.

Two ways into the same service context

Annotated view

Service-led

  1. 01Start with services

    Registered, non-registered, or guest entry.

  2. 02Establish product context

    Connect the service request to a relevant product.

  3. 03Configure quote

    Carry the selection into the quote platform.

Product-led

  1. 01Selected product

    Retain the product arriving from NGQ / OCX.

  2. 02Relevant services

    Auto-attached services, bundles, or individual selections.

  3. 03CPQ handoff

    Continue configuration with the chosen service context.

Simplified from the service-led and product-led flows, source pages 25–26. Branches and validation details remain in the original archive.

The complete design story

A closer look

01 / Source pages 1–5

Agree on the problem before specifying the interface

The study establishes a user-centered approach spanning understanding, definition, design, and delivery. Knowledge-transfer sessions with business and technology teams are used to align on the platform, product vision, requirements, and constraints.

The early strategy emphasizes structuring information, understanding platform modules, and reducing friction in service discovery. Later high-fidelity and development stages are described as part of the approach; the supplied work itself concentrates on strategy and journeys.

02 / Source pages 6–11

Build architecture and navigation from tasks

The approach moves from persona mapping to user journeys and information architecture. Card sorting is described as an input to restructuring, with low nesting and preservation of the user’s mental model as principles.

Concepts are compared through navigation, layout, use of available space, and simplicity. Wireframes are deliberately grayscale so functional decisions can be evaluated before visual styling. These pages describe the design method; they are not published usability-test results.

03 / Source pages 12–18

Five roles, different responsibilities

The questionnaire asks who configures and approves a quote, how requests reach sales and partners, and how people track progress. Those questions establish the handoffs that a service configuration experience must support.

Reference personas describe a customer seeking suitable services, a sales representative guiding the customer, a partner configuring quotes, an operations role resolving processing issues, and a solution architect associating services with products.

The source explicitly states that these personas are derived from role-play with dummy data because of NDA restrictions. Their concerns are illustrative design inputs, not validated participant findings.

04 / Source pages 19–24

A quote moves across people as well as platforms

A role-to-platform relationship view situates users among OCX, Smart Swap, Configurator, Diagnostics, Test, OCA, and Gypsy. The customer task flow then connects product selection, service configuration, quote handling, and order checks.

The customer and sales-representative journey maps make tracking, notifications, and assistance visible. The sales representative acts as a bridge rather than an isolated user. The published journeys are reference-only under the source’s NDA caveat.

05 / Source pages 25–27

Two entry paths into service configuration

A service-led path handles people beginning with services, including registered, non-registered, and guest contexts. A product-led path begins with a selected product and retains that context while relevant services are selected.

The product-led diagram includes auto-attached services, bundles or individual services, and basic, standard, and optimized options. Cross-platform handoffs between NGQ / OCX and CPQ are explicit. The documented outcome is a proposed system flow, not proof of a launched configuration service.

Design decisions

The thinking behind the experience.

Support both entry points

Service-led and product-led flows account for different starting contexts, instead of forcing every customer through a single path.

Keep services tied to the product

The product-led flow retains the selected product as the basis for displaying relevant services, including auto-attached services and additional selections.

Offer bundles and individual services

The proposed flow accommodates service bundles as well as individual services, with basic, standard, and optimized options shown in the product-led path.

Make handoffs and status visible

Quote status, notifications, and role-specific request views are included in the journeys to address the tracking needs described in the study.

What the work delivered

Role-based

Reference personas and journeys across five stakeholder roles

Two entry paths

Documented service-led and product-led system flows

Connected quotes

Proposed configuration, handoff, notification, and tracking journeys

The source documents experience strategy, reference personas, journeys, and proposed system flows. It does not report a launch, usability test results, or measured improvements in quote-processing time. The personas are derived from role-play and the journeys are reference-only due to NDA restrictions; they should not be read as validated research findings.

Read the original study

Complete source · 27 pages

Every page, in context

Original source — page 1 of 27. Original illustrations and source caveats retained.
Original source — page 1 of 27. Original illustrations and source caveats retained.

Next case study

Order Management

View project